Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 22, 2024, 03:25:17 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Ceriatone Forums are up and running!!!
 
Guests please register
Note: If you want to help you can donate to keep the forums alive.



Do you want to advertise on this forum ? Send me a private message.



Amplified Parts
+  Ceriatone Forum
|-+  Ceriatone
| |-+  Overtone
| | |-+  VOTE NOW!! Best Stock Overtone for Cleans?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: VOTE NOW!! Best Stock Overtone for Cleans?  (Read 7841 times)
TommyTone
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


View Profile
« on: May 19, 2010, 04:42:43 PM »

What STOCK built Overtone from Nik has the best cleans for use as a single channel clean amp??  Not concerened about what amp has the most versatility via OD channel - Just Clean Channel Only - thanks.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2010, 04:44:36 PM by TommyTone » Logged
mcinku
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1084



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2010, 06:42:41 AM »

For me it's skyline type tonestack sounds awesome for clean... that's OTS and OTS HRM.

but just for the record, if you like Fender clean, Bluesmaster is closer. BM type amp has scooped mids, more like Fender does. Skyline tonestak sounds bigger to me... especially with SC guitars.

 Wink
Logged

JD0x0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 298


Happy Hour Hero


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2010, 03:39:26 PM »

For me it's skyline type tonestack sounds awesome for clean... that's OTS and OTS HRM.


 Wink

+1 im a bigger fan of the skyliner stack in the OTS
Logged

It's true i've lost my marbles and i can't remember where i put them.
simplkndofman21
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2010, 06:49:48 PM »

if you wanted a clean only amp, why are you going for an OTS?  Huh?

as far as i know, they're known for their lead channel, and i read a lot about people being disatisfied with the cleans. why not get a fender twin?!  Grin
Logged
JD0x0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 298


Happy Hour Hero


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2010, 09:14:03 PM »

if you wanted a clean only amp, why are you going for an OTS?  Huh?

as far as i know, they're known for their lead channel, and i read a lot about people being disatisfied with the cleans. why not get a fender twin?!  Grin

the cleans are very nice IMO. But yes you are right. Why would you buy it as a clean amp with the ever so important OD channel which is the magic of this amp.

If you want nice cleans get a twin or something. If you want nice cleans and awesome Overdrive get an OTS
Logged

It's true i've lost my marbles and i can't remember where i put them.
TommyTone
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2010, 10:47:19 PM »

Sorry, that was not the question/poll.  Questions was what Ceriatone OTS model has the best clean channel in stock form - no mods. 
Logged
simplkndofman21
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2010, 01:40:28 PM »

from looking at the layouts it looks like the OTS, the HRM and the S&M all have the same clean channel, but the OD's are different.

whereas the bluesmaster has the same OD as the HRM and a modified clean channel to be more fendery, and i believe the clean is supposed to breakup a little better.

anyone feel free to correct me if i'm wrong, i'm still new to D-style amps.
Logged
JD0x0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 298


Happy Hour Hero


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2010, 03:45:38 PM »

IMO the bluesmaster sounds more "dry" and "lifeless" to my ear. Also i strongly dislike 90% of fenders because they are too scooped. The best cleans ive heard came from a Hiwatt, 74 Marshall JMP, and Fender Bassman (59) and the OTS (in no particular order)
Logged

It's true i've lost my marbles and i can't remember where i put them.
mcinku
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1084



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2010, 05:47:57 PM »

whereas the bluesmaster has the same OD as the HRM

Not exactly true... both amps have HRM board but the rest is more or less different ...
 Wink
Logged

simplkndofman21
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2010, 06:33:35 PM »

really? i thought the only difference between the HRM and the Bluesmaster was the clean channel, and then the OD would follow in its tonal mastery because its technically not a seperate channel?
Logged
Pickmaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 504



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2010, 09:00:01 PM »

Non HRM OTS 100w !
Especially with MMs and my mods. Blows away Fender twin with no problems.
Cleans are so good on my Li’l monsta I don’t want to switch on a drive channel.
Don’t get me wrong! Drive is also fantastic but cleans – oh! Pure orgasm! Kiss
Logged

Founder and technical director of the Custom Cabinet Company – CCC
http://www.customcabcom.com
mcinku
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1084



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2010, 06:18:39 AM »

really? i thought the only difference between the HRM and the Bluesmaster was the clean channel, and then the OD would follow in its tonal mastery because its technically not a seperate channel?

Let see... Bluesmaster have different plate and cathode resistors, no snubbers on the V2, slightly different HRM tonestack, different bright cap on OD level,...due to different dropping string plate voltage is different as well.... well almost everything is different- except layout is more or less the same
 Wink
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

CeriaTone Forum is not afiliated with Ceriatone Amplifications. The CeriaTone and name, logo and related trademarks and service marks, owned by CeriaTone. , are registered and/or used in the U.S. and many foreign countries. All other trademarks, service marks, and trade names referenced in this site are the property of their respective owners.