As far as I know the Paraloop or other parallel loop devices like the Lehle Parallel (unless it's a parallel FX Loop Buffer like the Fuchs) don't Buffer your FX Loop at all.

I think the only way in the price range 100-150$ is a kleinulator. Never heard of any other comparable unit in that price range.

Hey Babybear2011

I didnt want to have an extra rack unit either so I did this with a pair of scissors and jigsaw.

The tube driven Buffered effects loop is the way to go IMO!

Todd

All I'm going to say should be taken in the light of the fact that I'm presently putting together a parts order to build a C/D-lator.

BUT.....the Kleinulator does do what it's suppose to do. And is a great improvement over nothing. I can't compare it to a C-lator, but I have it on good authority that the C-lator is the way to go.

Also, I don't know if having it on a pedalboard with long cable runs is a good idea. I sit it on top of the amp. Just something to consider.

OK, I'm sitting here trying to figure out what is the purpose of this post. Also how does it help the OP and his question.

What did I miss?

Are you referring to the Surh MiniMix combo deal?

I would like to try the Surh setup to see what that's about. But IMO with what I have experienced so far, the less in the loop the better. I should have said in the earlier post that between the two (Klein & C-lator) the C-lator is better.

What did I miss?
[/quote]

Yes, I guess you did. Sometimes one can use a site search for older posts.
I’ve posted here several times about different loop devices which works better than Dlator-Bludolat-Cilat-Tonesuckulator. Some expensive, some cheap but very good and somehow almost everyone here still obsessed with average series loopolators.

You mean that modified RP series digitech deal. No thanks. I'll stick with a tube buffer and my TC2290.

First of all I wasn't asking about buffered loops, so WTF are you talking about.

And I hate parallel loops. You know, some here might just have their own idea of what is best.