|
Title: Am I missing anything by using the Fuchs Verbrator instead of the C-lator? Post by: bigwebb83 on December 30, 2011, 04:06:43 PM Title is pretty self explanitory. Just wondering if there is something that the C-lator has the the verbrator does not?
Title: Re: Am I missing anything by using the Fuchs Verbrator instead of the C-lator? Post by: exocet on December 30, 2011, 05:07:32 PM I use one mainly for the Reverb.
I like it a lot. The only thing that it lacks is a "master volume" that would allow you to wind up the master on the amp and control the overall amp sound level via the Veberator. You can sort of do this if you put the Verbrator into Series mode which then puts the main signal path through the Fx Send / Return on the Verbrator and linking the Send / Return loop with a cable (assuming that you don't have any other Fx in the loop. The Fx Return gain then acts as a Master. Overall, I prefer the sound with the unit running in Parallel. I've had mine for 2 years, no problems and a lovely sounding unit. Title: Re: Am I missing anything by using the Fuchs Verbrator instead of the C-lator? Post by: hurtwoodec on January 15, 2012, 02:47:10 AM I'm finding the bright switches on the c-lator really useful when switching between guitars and also venues. It tames piercing bright strat sounds and adds some sparkle to my PRSi FWIW.
|