50 WATTER OR 100 WATTER

Blues Junkie
Newbie

Offline

Posts: 4

« on: May 18, 2011, 07:57:58 PM »

So I am finalizing my order from Nik and I have decided to go with the Ceriatone 'FM' With modern eagle mod. I was wondering what are you guys/gals going with... 50 watter or 100 watter? From everything I have ever read it seem's that a 100 watter is the way to go... just curious about what everyone is going with.

Thanks.


	Logged

T Wilcox
Sr. Member

Offline

Gender: Male

Posts: 399

Re: 50 WATTER OR 100 WATTER

« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2011, 08:06:54 PM »

Well i went with the 50Watt FM50 and love it. It is loud enough for anything i will ever use it for!
I have not played a 100 watter so cant give comparison.
It is cheaper on tube replacement, especially if you go NOS.

Not sure, but I've heard the only real difference will be the amount of clean headroom!
Loudness difference between the two is only 3db fully cranked

Todd


	Logged

Plexi bass 1986 ( build #6 )
Ceriatone Ultra Champ ( build #5 )
TW Express clone ( build #4 )
Ceriatone HRM MK2 ( build #3 )
Ceriatone 2550 ( Build #2 )
Ceriatone OTS FM50 Modern Eagle Mod (Build #1)
EBMM Steve Morse original
50th anniv American Strat

sduck
Full Member

Offline

Gender: Male

Posts: 173

Re: 50 WATTER OR 100 WATTER

« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2011, 03:56:06 AM »

I think it depends on what you're planning on doing with it. 100 watts is probably a better choice for gigging and will probably resell better. For at home playing 50 watts will serve you adequately. My 50 watt bluesmaster is blisteringly loud at even low settings in my small studio.


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? November 22, 2024, 12:53:19 PM

News: Ceriatone Forums are up and running!!! Guests please register Note: If you want to help you can to keep the forums alive. Do you want to advertise on this forum ? Send me a private message.